3 of today’s 10 FMCSA-revoked ELDs had already been pulled once

The FMCSA removed 10 more electronic logging devices from the registered list today. OnTime Logs iOSix from OnTime Logs Inc. LAST MINUTE ELD from Last Minute ELD. Porter ELD from Porter ELD. Zee HOS Compliance from Zee App. EV ELD IOSIX from Ev ELD Inc. Light and Travel ELD from LIGHT AND TRAVEL LLC. PREMIERRIDE LOGS from PREMIERRIDE LOGS LLC.

Two devices, 2BRO ELD and 305 ELD, from TWO BRO SECURITY & IT SOLUTIONS. TT ELD 40 from TT ELD Inc. All ten failed the minimum technical requirements in 49 CFR Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 395. All ten are on the revoked list as of this afternoon.

Add today’s ten to the twelve from May 20, and TRUCKSTAFF ELD from June 23, and the total since January 2025 is ninety. Ninety devices in eighteen and a half months. 4. 9 per month, which is exactly the pace I calculated seven weeks ago. Nothing about the enforcement tempo has changed. The pace is the pace.

Administrator Derek Barrs again put everybody on notice: “We will continue to take decisive enforcement action to ensure that only compliant, reliable devices are used on our nation’s roadways.

Accurate hours-of-service records are essential to protecting public safety, supporting fair enforcement, and ensuring accountability across the commercial motor vehicle industry.” Note the word that was not in the May statement. Accountability. If you are running one of the ten devices named today, your timeline is the same as it always is.

Stop using it now. Revert to paper logs or compliant logging software. Replace the device with a compliant ELD from the registered list before September 8, 2026. Before that date, roadside enforcement is being told not to cite drivers using the revoked devices for 395. 8(a)(1) or 395. 22(a). Officers will ask for your paper logs instead.

On and after September 8, you will be cited for no record of duty status and will go out of service under the CVSA criteria. The truck stops. The load does not move. The violation lands in SMS and in every carrier vetting system that pulls FMCSA data, and it stays there. That is the compliance guidance. You have read it here before. I wrote it on May 20.

I wrote it thirteen days before that. I wrote it last May for the Gorilla Fleet batch. The guidance does not change because the underlying problem does not change. Here’s what changes. Today’s list is not ten independent failures. There are fewer companies than it looks like. Go back to my last piece on this.

Near the bottom, in the section where I told carriers to audit their own vendors, I wrote: “Check whether any of the manufacturer’s other devices have been revoked, because a manufacturer that loses one device to a compliance failure may have the same engineering problems across its entire product line.”

Today’s bulletin is that sentence with a case number attached. Moral of the story: listen to Rob Carpenter. He knows things. ONTIME LOGS INC is on this list. FMCSA already revoked an OnTime Logs device on November 20, 2025. That one was called Ontime Logs PT, model number OTL100. The one pulled today is called Ontime Logs iosix, model number OTL101.

One digit apart. Eight months apart. Same company, both devices gone. EV ELD Inc. is on this list. Except the bulletin does not say Ev ELD Inc. It says Ev ELD Inc. (f/k/a Evo ELD Inc.) Formerly known as. The device is EV ELD IOSIX, f/k/a EVO ELD IOSIX. The model is EV 2, f/k/a EVO 2. FMCSA revoked EVO ELD 1 on October 17, 2025.

That device carried ELD identifier G711H2. The device revoked today carries the identifier G711H3. Sequential. Consecutive. Registered back-to-back by the same company, revoked nine months apart, with a rebrand in between. Evo became Ev. They dropped a letter.

We spend years tracking chameleon carriers that die under one DOT number and reappear the next quarter under another, with the same trucks, the same officers, the same phone number, and a marginally different spelling of the same name.

We have white-label, chameleon ELD networks, many of which run on the same Telegram and RingCentral systems, tying them together. The mechanics on display in today’s ELD bulletin are the same behavior applied to a different registry. It works at scale.

Last month, I published an investigation into an hours-of-service falsification operation run from Moldova through a Wyoming holding company. That one parent entity owned at least fourteen ELD brands, added to its portfolio by signed annex, the way a carrier adds trucks. FMCSA revoked six of those brands.

It revoked them the way the registry allows, one device at a time, each revocation a standalone line in a standalone bulletin, and when I last checked the registry in late June, sibling brands from the same corporate family were still on the registered list. Not because the agency missed something, but because the registry has no field for “same owner.”

Six revocations against one company, and the registry recorded them as six unrelated events. Then there is TWO BRO SECURITY & IT SOLUTIONS, which los